<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gold Book Blog &#187; Uncategorized</title>
	<atom:link href="http://goldbook.bankingspectrum.com/blog/category/uncategorized/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://goldbook.bankingspectrum.com/blog</link>
	<description>Bank-to-Bank Talk</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 21:09:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>What Do You Think?</title>
		<link>http://goldbook.bankingspectrum.com/blog/2012/01/24/what-do-you-think/</link>
		<comments>http://goldbook.bankingspectrum.com/blog/2012/01/24/what-do-you-think/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 21:09:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin User</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goldbook.bankingspectrum.com/blog/?p=500</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lease Security Accounts A lease security account is a statutory creation intended to hold deposits of rent security in escrow for the protection of landlords and tenants.  In New York, the  rule pertains to property rentals in a building with six or more family dwelling units and  in New Jersey, the rule applies to landlords [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Lease Security Accounts</strong><br />
A lease security account is a statutory creation intended to hold deposits of rent security in escrow for the protection of landlords and tenants.  In New York, the  rule pertains to property rentals in a building with six or more family dwelling units and  in New Jersey, the rule applies to landlords with 10 rental units or more.</p>
<p>In accordance with N.J.S.A. 46:8-19, a <strong>New Jersey</strong> landlord is no longer entitled to receive, as administration expenses, 1%  interest on the balance in the account. The interest paid on the deposit amount belongs to the tenant.</p>
<p>According to the New York General Obligations Law Section 7-103, a lease security deposit must be placed at a <strong>New York</strong> banking organization in an interest bearing account, with the first 1% of interest earned on the account remitted to the landlord.  The balance of the interest may be paid to the tenant or given as a credit against rent.  The law states that the lease security deposit (usually 1 or 2 months of rent on a residential lease) must be placed in a “prevailing rate” account.</p>
<ul>
<li>But what if your non-CD accounts are paying 1% or less?  Does this mean the landlord gets all the interest on the account?</li>
</ul>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong><em>WE WANT TO KNOW WHAT YOU THINK!<br />
CLICK HERE TO:</em></strong></p>
<span class="sfforumlink"><a href="http://goldbook.bankingspectrum.com/blog/forum/new-accounts/what-do-you-think/"><img src="http://goldbook.bankingspectrum.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/simple-forum/styles/icons/default/bloglink.png" alt="" /> Join the forum discussion on this post</a></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://goldbook.bankingspectrum.com/blog/2012/01/24/what-do-you-think/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What&#8217;s New: SAFE Act</title>
		<link>http://goldbook.bankingspectrum.com/blog/2011/11/14/whats-new-safe-act/</link>
		<comments>http://goldbook.bankingspectrum.com/blog/2011/11/14/whats-new-safe-act/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 14:07:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin User</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[What's New]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goldbook.bankingspectrum.com/blog/?p=479</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Gold Book has been updated to include information about the Secure and Fair Enforcement for Mortgage Licensing Act (S.A.F.E. Act). See Lending Compliance and Consumer Loan Regulation. Join the forum discussion on this post]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Gold Book has been updated to include information about the Secure and Fair Enforcement for Mortgage Licensing Act (S.A.F.E. Act). See <a href="http://goldbook.bankingspectrum.com/quickview/4956">Lending Compliance</a> and <a href="http://goldbook.bankingspectrum.com/quickview/6616">Consumer Loan Regulation</a>.</p>
<span class="sfforumlink"><a href="http://goldbook.bankingspectrum.com/blog/forum/consumer-loans/whats-new-safe-act/"><img src="http://goldbook.bankingspectrum.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/simple-forum/styles/icons/default/bloglink.png" alt="" /> Join the forum discussion on this post</a></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://goldbook.bankingspectrum.com/blog/2011/11/14/whats-new-safe-act/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Proposed Revisions to Flood Insurance Q &amp; As</title>
		<link>http://goldbook.bankingspectrum.com/blog/2011/10/28/proposed-revisions-to-flood-insurance-q-as/</link>
		<comments>http://goldbook.bankingspectrum.com/blog/2011/10/28/proposed-revisions-to-flood-insurance-q-as/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 19:43:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin User</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goldbook.bankingspectrum.com/blog/?p=471</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The federal agencies that supervise banks, thrifts, and credit unions, and the Farm Credit System, published guidance last week that updates the Interagency Questions and Answers Regarding Flood Insurance that were most recently published on July 21, 2009 at 74 FR 35914-35947. The guidance finalizes two questions and answers that had been previously proposed. The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The federal agencies that supervise banks, thrifts, and credit unions,  and the Farm Credit System, published guidance last week that updates the <em>Interagency Questions and Answers Regarding Flood Insurance </em>that were most recently published on July 21, 2009 at 74 FR 35914-35947.</p>
<p>The guidance finalizes two questions and answers that had been  previously proposed.</p>
<p>The agencies request comment on three additional proposed updates  to questions and answers relating to force placement of flood  insurance.</p>
<p>It is the intention of the agencies that, after public comment  has been received and considered and the guidance has been adopted in  final form, the agencies will issue a final update to the 2009 <em>Interagency Questions and Answers Regarding Flood Insurance</em>.  The final update will continue to supplement other guidance or  interpretations issued by the agencies and the Federal Emergency  Management Agency.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://goldbook.bankingspectrum.com/blog/2011/10/28/proposed-revisions-to-flood-insurance-q-as/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What&#8217;s New: Updated Gold Book Content</title>
		<link>http://goldbook.bankingspectrum.com/blog/2011/09/26/whats-new-updated-gold-book-content/</link>
		<comments>http://goldbook.bankingspectrum.com/blog/2011/09/26/whats-new-updated-gold-book-content/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 19:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin User</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[What's New]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goldbook.bankingspectrum.com/blog/?p=446</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sections of The Gold Book have been recently updated to reflect the repeal of Regulation Q (see Interest on Deposits ) and NYS changes to the handling of information subpoenas (see the update in a sub-section of the Adverse Claims chapter).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sections of The Gold Book have been recently updated to reflect the repeal of Regulation Q (<a href="http://goldbook.bankingspectrum.com/quickview/5677">see Interest on Deposits </a>) and NYS changes to the handling of information subpoenas (<a href="http://goldbook.bankingspectrum.com/quickview/4003">see the update in a sub-section of the Adverse Claims chapter</a>).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://goldbook.bankingspectrum.com/blog/2011/09/26/whats-new-updated-gold-book-content/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Deposit Insurance Notice Requirement Regarding the Payment of Interest on Demand Deposit Accounts</title>
		<link>http://goldbook.bankingspectrum.com/blog/2011/07/21/deposit-insurance-notice-requirement-regarding-the-payment-of-interest-on-demand-deposit-accounts/</link>
		<comments>http://goldbook.bankingspectrum.com/blog/2011/07/21/deposit-insurance-notice-requirement-regarding-the-payment-of-interest-on-demand-deposit-accounts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 16:43:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin User</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goldbook.bankingspectrum.com/blog/?p=434</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Under a provision of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank Act), insured depository institutions may pay interest on demand deposit accounts (DDAs) starting July 21, 2011. Under another section of the Dodd-Frank Act, the FDIC provides unlimited deposit insurance for noninterest-bearing transaction accounts through December 31, 2012.  If on or after [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Under a provision of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank Act), insured depository institutions may pay interest on demand deposit accounts (DDAs) starting July 21, 2011. Under another section of the Dodd-Frank Act, the FDIC provides unlimited deposit insurance for noninterest-bearing transaction accounts through December 31, 2012.  If on or after July 21, 2011, an insured depository institution modifies the terms of a DDA so that the account may pay interest, the institution must notify affected customers that the account no longer will be eligible for unlimited deposit insurance coverage as a noninterest-bearing transaction account.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://goldbook.bankingspectrum.com/blog/2011/07/21/deposit-insurance-notice-requirement-regarding-the-payment-of-interest-on-demand-deposit-accounts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IRS Raises 2011 Mileage Rates Mid-Year</title>
		<link>http://goldbook.bankingspectrum.com/blog/2011/07/19/irs-raises-2011-mileage-rates-mid-year/</link>
		<comments>http://goldbook.bankingspectrum.com/blog/2011/07/19/irs-raises-2011-mileage-rates-mid-year/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 14:18:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin User</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goldbook.bankingspectrum.com/blog/?p=424</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The IRS has recently issued announcement 2011-40 which provides for mid-year adjustments to the 2011 mileage rates. The rates were changed to reflect the increase in gas prices since last year. Effective July 1, 2011, the business standard mileage rate will rise to 55.5 cents per mile and the medical/moving mileage rate to 23.5 cents [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The IRS has recently issued announcement 2011-40 which provides for mid-year adjustments to the 2011 mileage rates. The rates were changed to reflect the increase in gas prices since last year.</p>
<p>Effective July 1, 2011, the business standard mileage rate will rise to 55.5 cents per mile and the medical/moving mileage rate to 23.5 cents per mile. The charitable standard mileage rate remains at 14 cents per mile for the remainder of 2011.</p>
<p>The standard mileage rate is used by taxpayers to deduct costs of operating vehicles for business purposes. The standard rate is also used by many businesses to reimburse employees for mileage. The moving/medical rates are used to compute deductible costs of operating a vehicle for medical or moving purposes. The charitable mileage rate is used to determine vehicle costs for charitable purposes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://goldbook.bankingspectrum.com/blog/2011/07/19/irs-raises-2011-mileage-rates-mid-year/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Abandoned Property Updates Underway</title>
		<link>http://goldbook.bankingspectrum.com/blog/2011/05/05/abandoned-property-updates-underway/</link>
		<comments>http://goldbook.bankingspectrum.com/blog/2011/05/05/abandoned-property-updates-underway/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 19:07:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin User</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goldbook.bankingspectrum.com/blog/?p=401</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Please be advised that on March 31, 2011, New York passed amendments to the Abandoned Property Law. The new law, effective immediately and due with the next reporting cycle, provides the following: Lower dormancy periods (from 5 years to 3 years) for the following property types: Money or securities held in escrow, but excluding escrow [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Please be advised that on March 31, 2011, New York passed amendments to the Abandoned  Property Law. </strong><strong>The new law, effective immediately and due  with the next reporting cycle, provides the following:</strong></p>
<p>Lower dormancy periods (from 5 years to 3 years) for the following property types:</p>
<ul>
<li>Money or securities held in escrow, but excluding escrow accounts  for which the duty or obligation for which such amount was deposited has  not been performed and such performance is still required</li>
<li>Amounts due on deposits or any amount to which a shareholder of a savings and loan or a credit union is entitled</li>
<li>Accumulations of interest or other increments held by a bank for  payment of an interest in a bond and mortgage apportioned or transferred  by it</li>
</ul>
<p>In addition to adjusting dormancy periods,<strong> the new law</strong> also amended New York’s reporting provisions.  There are three major changes to keep in mind for your next report to New York:</p>
<p>1.       <strong>Publication requirements</strong>: Every banking organization must publish <span style="text-decoration: underline;">on or before September 1st</span> of each year a notice naming potential owners of unclaimed property being held by the banking organization.  <em>This  provision provides a little more flexibility in that the previous  requirement  mandated that the banking organization had to publish the  notice within 30 days  of filing their report.</em></p>
<p>2.       <strong>Preliminary reports no longer required</strong>:  Certain industries (mainly in the financial services industry) were   required to file a preliminary report and conduct a publication prior to   remitting a final report/remittance.  This  bill removes the  preliminary report requirement.  The bill further confirms the reporting   deadlines and cut-off dates.  Once the  statutory due diligence and  publication requirements have been satisfied, the  report and remittance  would be due (for banking institutions) by November 10th.</p>
<p>3.       <strong>Miscellaneous: </strong> NY  State law still  mandates that all unclaimed funds valued at $20 and higher follow  the  statutory due diligence requirements.   The State Controller’s Office  posts all owners entitled to property  valued at $20 and higher on their  website for at least one year.Gift  cards remain at a 5 year dormancy  period.</p>
<p>Please  check back soon for as we continue to update the <a href="http://goldbook.bankingspectrum.com/quickview/4166">Abandoned Property</a> section of The Gold Book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://goldbook.bankingspectrum.com/blog/2011/05/05/abandoned-property-updates-underway/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Abandoned Property Law Changes</title>
		<link>http://goldbook.bankingspectrum.com/blog/2011/04/28/abandoned-property-law-changes/</link>
		<comments>http://goldbook.bankingspectrum.com/blog/2011/04/28/abandoned-property-law-changes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 17:51:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin User</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goldbook.bankingspectrum.com/blog/?p=399</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New abandoned property law changes for NYS are effective immediately.  Notably, the escheatment period for deposit accounts has been reduced from 5 to 3 years, and the reduction in time period applies to other types of abandoned property as well.  The November report must reflect the new time period.  Other changes have been made in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New abandoned property law changes for NYS are effective immediately.  Notably, the escheatment period for deposit accounts has been reduced from 5 to 3 years, and the reduction in time period applies to other types of abandoned property as well.  The November report must reflect the new time period.  Other changes have been made in the law regarding preliminary reports and publication requirements.</p>
<p>Check back soon for updated information and news about updates to the abandoned property section of The Gold Book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://goldbook.bankingspectrum.com/blog/2011/04/28/abandoned-property-law-changes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Proposed Reg Z Rule</title>
		<link>http://goldbook.bankingspectrum.com/blog/2011/04/20/proposed-reg-z-rule/</link>
		<comments>http://goldbook.bankingspectrum.com/blog/2011/04/20/proposed-reg-z-rule/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 13:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin User</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goldbook.bankingspectrum.com/blog/?p=394</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Federal Reserve proposes rule under Regulation Z pertaining to a consumer&#8217;s ability to repay a mortgage and minimum mortgage underwriting standards. The Federal Reserve Board on Tuesday requested public comment on a proposed rule under Regulation Z that would require creditors to determine a consumer&#8217;s ability to repay a mortgage before making the loan and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Federal Reserve proposes rule under Regulation Z pertaining to a consumer&#8217;s ability to repay a mortgage and minimum mortgage underwriting standards.</strong></p>
<p>The Federal Reserve Board on Tuesday requested public comment on a  proposed rule under Regulation Z that would require creditors to  determine a consumer&#8217;s ability to repay a mortgage before making the  loan and would establish minimum mortgage underwriting standards.</p>
<p>The revisions to the regulation, which implements the Truth in  Lending Act (TILA), are being made pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Wall  Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. The proposal would apply to  all consumer mortgages (except home equity lines of credit, timeshare  plans, reverse mortgages, or temporary loans).</p>
<p>Consistent with the act, the proposal would provide four options for complying with the ability-to-repay requirement.</p>
<ul>
<li> First, a creditor can meet the general ability-to-repay standard  by considering and verifying specified underwriting factors, such as  the consumer&#8217;s income or assets.</li>
<li> Second, a creditor can make a &#8220;qualified mortgage,&#8221; which  provides the creditor with special protection from liability provided  the loan does not have certain features, such as negative amortization;  the fees are within specified limits; and the creditor underwrites the  mortgage payment using the maximum interest rate in the first five  years. The Board is soliciting comment on two alternative approaches for  defining a &#8220;qualified mortgage.&#8221;</li>
<li> Third, a creditor operating predominantly in rural or  underserved areas can make a balloon-payment qualified mortgage. This  option is meant to preserve access to credit for consumers located in  rural or underserved areas where banks originate balloon loans to hedge  against interest rate risk for loans held in portfolio.</li>
<li> Finally, a creditor can refinance a &#8220;non-standard mortgage&#8221; with  risky features into a more stable &#8220;standard mortgage&#8221; with a lower  monthly payment. This option is meant to preserve access to streamlined  refinancings.</li>
</ul>
<p>The proposal would also implement the Dodd-Frank Act&#8217;s limits on prepayment penalties.</p>
<p>The Board is soliciting comment on the proposed rule until July  22, 2011. General rulemaking authority for TILA is scheduled to transfer  to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau on July 21, 2011.  Accordingly, this rulemaking will not be finalized by the Board.</p>
<p>The Board&#8217;s notice for the proposed rule can be found here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/press/bcreg/bcreg20110419a1.pdf">Highlights of Proposed Ability-to-Repay Rules (26 KB PDF)</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/press/bcreg/bcreg20110419b1.pdf">Notice (1.15 MB PDF)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://goldbook.bankingspectrum.com/blog/2011/04/20/proposed-reg-z-rule/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FDIC Overdraft Payment Guidance Q &amp; A</title>
		<link>http://goldbook.bankingspectrum.com/blog/2011/04/20/fdic-overdraft-payment-guidance-q-a/</link>
		<comments>http://goldbook.bankingspectrum.com/blog/2011/04/20/fdic-overdraft-payment-guidance-q-a/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 13:08:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin User</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goldbook.bankingspectrum.com/blog/?p=391</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The FDIC recently released a FAQ (Q &#38; A) in response to the Overdraft Payment Supervisory Guidance issued in November 2010. It can be found here: http://www.fdic.gov/news/conferences/overdraft/FAQ.pdf Join the forum discussion on this post]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The FDIC recently released a FAQ (Q &amp; A) in response to the Overdraft Payment Supervisory Guidance issued in November 2010.</p>
<p>It can be found here:</p>
<p>http://www.fdic.gov/news/conferences/overdraft/FAQ.pdf</p>
<span class="sfforumlink"><a href="http://goldbook.bankingspectrum.com/blog/forum/federal-deposit-insurance/fdic-overdraft-payment-guidance-q-a/"><img src="http://goldbook.bankingspectrum.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/simple-forum/styles/icons/default/bloglink.png" alt="" /> Join the forum discussion on this post</a></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://goldbook.bankingspectrum.com/blog/2011/04/20/fdic-overdraft-payment-guidance-q-a/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

